« A Corporate Officer may be Held Liable as an “Employer” under the Fair Labor Standards Act | Main | Online Tool Can Assist Attorneys in Determining Reach of Federal Subpoenas »

April 20, 2009

Comments

Thirteen

I'm not persuaded by the opinion's distinction between creation and reproduction of documents. I don't think technology works on such distinctions. For instance, if I have a scanner that, in one expensive operation, scans a document, reads its text, makes the doc searchable, and makes the document available as a pdf, do I get that cost in under 1920 just because I bought a machine that does everything at once? Yes, presumably.

Courts are balking at the cost, not at the function. The technology and features it provides (e.g., searchable documents) make everyones lives better.

The comments to this entry are closed.